Download free Zoo
Movie Information
A young scientist searches to find out what's causing a rash of violent animal attacks.
A young scientist searches to find out what's causing a rash of violent animal attacks.
Creators:Scott Rosenberg, Josh Appelbaum, André Nemec, Jeff Pinkner
Stars:James Wolk, Kristen Connolly, Nonso Anozie
Full Storyline For Viewers
Violent animal attacks upon humans are occurring all over the world.
Jackson Oz, an American zoologist who offers safaris in Africa, begins
to notice the animals' strange behavior and takes it upon himself to
solve the reason why before these attacks become more coordinated and
ferocious. Written by
Soumik Ghosh
Full User Reviews
Zoo has a simple
concept of animals rebelling against humans. Enough is enough for them
as they randomly converge on some tree or attack random passerby. It has
merit since with both viewpoints from savanna and urban locales
simultaneously detect anomalies. Unfortunately, there's not much
interest sparked by the human characters while the animals certainly
can't carry the show by themselves.
Its most problematic issue is the awkward writing. None of the personalities are fascinating, in fact nearly everyone is either showing exaggerated emotions or lack of urgency. For the city perspective, we have the story of a journalist who writes blog of preserving animal rights. She's meant to be a strong female lead, but sadly she just seems preachy and unapproachable.
The savanna cast is very elementary, they even react very stiff in face of danger, bantering about theory while the animals literally just attacked them. I reckon it could be better if presentation could resemble Jurassic Park or Planet of the Apes, but such caliber is not within the Zoo's grasp.
Ultimately, the show sounds rather tediously pretentious and nonsensical. It could build tension, but it would be a long trek for audience to follow since there's no character, walking with paws or feet, is worthy on investing time on.
Its most problematic issue is the awkward writing. None of the personalities are fascinating, in fact nearly everyone is either showing exaggerated emotions or lack of urgency. For the city perspective, we have the story of a journalist who writes blog of preserving animal rights. She's meant to be a strong female lead, but sadly she just seems preachy and unapproachable.
The savanna cast is very elementary, they even react very stiff in face of danger, bantering about theory while the animals literally just attacked them. I reckon it could be better if presentation could resemble Jurassic Park or Planet of the Apes, but such caliber is not within the Zoo's grasp.
Ultimately, the show sounds rather tediously pretentious and nonsensical. It could build tension, but it would be a long trek for audience to follow since there's no character, walking with paws or feet, is worthy on investing time on.
